|
Post by Sister Coyote on Jan 31, 2011 19:09:22 GMT -5
Booyah indeed.
|
|
|
Post by peekercpa on Jan 31, 2011 21:27:31 GMT -5
most likely mle gets it tomorrow.
|
|
|
Post by zumabot on Jan 31, 2011 22:18:51 GMT -5
Ed put up a hell of a fight.
Let's claim late in the Night this wednesday. Bob and I are confirmed town now, so there is a decent chance they kill me tonight. That way you can be confirmed tomorrow as well, and there won't be any nonsense about Ed "investigating" you.
|
|
|
Post by zumabot on Feb 1, 2011 10:19:07 GMT -5
I'm guessing 2 scum left. 5 seems about right for this game. I don't think we should blindly accept hypna/suburban's claims either. This scum team obviously isn't afraid to take bold risks. Hypna was trying to push the "maybe Ed misunderstood his role PM" yesterday.
|
|
|
Post by zumabot on Feb 1, 2011 10:35:51 GMT -5
well, if mle is telling the truth it's 7-2-1 now and most likely 6-2-1 tomorrow.
If we claim tonight, worst case is one of me/bob get killed, and you and bob/me are off the table for tomorrow. Hrm. Here are the players left:
2. Moody Mitchy 4. Hypnagogic Bonafide (claimed on-shot cop) 6. Mlerose (claimed 3rd party) 7. Metallic Squink 8. peeker (town) 13. Scumbot 3000 (town) 14. Hockey Monkey 15. Suburban Plankton (supposedly investigated town by claimed one-shot cop) 17. Idle Thoughts 18. BobArrgh (investigated town, possible godfather, probably off the table for now)
I'm not sure what strategy I have right now. Re-reading yesterday, I'm now getting a town vibe from squink. I am going to re-read and look at votes, ignoring the hypna/burb claims for now.
|
|
|
Post by zumabot on Feb 1, 2011 10:41:54 GMT -5
Another thing which makes me suspicious of hypna/burb. If they're telling the truth, then we have, out of 14 or 15 players (depending on if mle is scum or 3rd party, i tend to believe her for now tho... it wouldn't make sense for scum to claim that when she did, I don't think).
cop one-shot cop watcher docter mason mason
6 power roles with no evidence yet of scum power roles (although the romanic day death might indicate one) seems a bit off. I don't know.
|
|
|
Post by peekercpa on Feb 2, 2011 9:23:36 GMT -5
that's why i wonder if bob is potentially a gf. and would that in any way have contributed to ed's weird claim? i mean i don't know but it seems odd.
|
|
|
Post by peekercpa on Feb 2, 2011 15:39:44 GMT -5
just ot make sure. we can point to our breadcrumbs in the Night thread, right?[/color
|
|
|
Post by peekercpa on Feb 2, 2011 15:40:35 GMT -5
just to make sure. we can point to our breadcrumbs in the Night thread, right?{/color]
|
|
|
Post by peekercpa on Feb 2, 2011 15:41:45 GMT -5
maybe the third time around
just to make sure. we can point to our breadcrumbs in the Night thread, right?
|
|
|
Post by peekercpa on Feb 2, 2011 15:42:55 GMT -5
thank fragging og.
if you are around zuma let me know when you want to fire away. otherwise i will probably give it a go in just a bit.
|
|
|
Post by peekercpa on Feb 2, 2011 15:48:01 GMT -5
and in a bit i mean about an hour or two.
since we led the charge on ed and he flipped scum if there is a town vig unless they are a box of rocks we don't have to worry about that. and i don't want to give scum a chance to change their target if it happens to be not one of us.
|
|
|
Post by zumabot on Feb 2, 2011 17:17:37 GMT -5
I should be around before the end of Night. We might as well wait as long as we can, as you said, no reason to give scum any more info and be allowed to change their kill.
|
|
|
Post by Sister Coyote on Feb 2, 2011 17:21:42 GMT -5
Yes, you may post links to your breadcrumbs in the Night thread if you wish
|
|
|
Post by zumabot on Feb 2, 2011 17:35:38 GMT -5
This qualifies as more of an entire loaf, I think. We should post that we're both masons, there are only 2 of us, and I see no reason not to post our role names, Thing 1 and Thing 2.
|
|